ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Testing of Co-Fermentation of Poultry Manure and Corn Silage
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Zielona Gora, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Poland
 
2
University of Zielona Góra, Department of Mathematical Statistics and Econometrics, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2014-12-10
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2014;13(2):31-47
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The development of the production of poultry meat is connected with an increase in the quantity of the manure. The chemical characteristics predisposes this waste to processing by methane fermentation method. This study investigated the influence of ammonia and volatile fat acids on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of poultry manure. The aim of the studies was: to determine the degree of biodegradation of the poultry manure as well as manure and corn silage mixed in various proportions in the process of mesophilic fermentation, to evaluate the impact of mineral nitrogen and volatile fat acids on the course of fermentation, and to establish optimum proportions of these types of waste. The tests confirmed the positive effect of co-fermentation of poultry manure with corn silage. The most favourable ratio for mixing the substrates is the equal percentage of their dry matter in the mixture. With such waste mixing proportions, the degree of degradation of organic substances contained in the manure amounted to 61.8% and was higher than in the mono-digestion of manure and corn silage.
 
REFERENCES (27)
1.
APHA: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association, 2012.
 
2.
Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B.K.: Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38 (1993) 560564.
 
3.
Bhattacharya, S., Parkin, G.: The effect of ammonia on methane fermentation process. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 61 (1989) 55-59.
 
4.
Bujoczek, G., Oleszkiewicz, J., Sparling, R. and Cenkowski, S.: High Solid Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 76 (2000) 51-60.
 
5.
Cheng Wen-Hsi, Chou Ming-Shean, and Tung Shu-Chu: Gaseous ammonia emission from poultry facilities in Tajwan., Environ. Engng. Sci.. 28(4), 283-289. doi:10.1089/ees.2010.0205, 2011.
 
6.
Dobrzański, Z.: The relationship between modern poultry production systems and the protection of natural and productive environment. III Agricultural Forum. Poznań 2001, 20-25.
 
7.
Foged, H. L., Flotats, X., Bonmati, A. B., Palatsi, J., Magri, A. and Schelde, K. M.: Inventory of manure processing activities in Europe. Technical Report No. I concerning “Manure Processing Activities in Europe” to the European Commission, Directorate-General Environment. 138 pp, 2011.
 
8.
Güngör-Demirci, G., Demirer, G. N.: Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 93, 20 (2004) 109-117.
 
9.
Jędrczak, A.: Biological treatment of waste. PWN, Warsaw, Polish, 2007.
 
10.
Jędrczak, A., and Myszograj, S.: Fermentation of organic waste from Turkey breeding and slaughterhouses, PJoES (Series of Monographs). 2 (2010) 62-72.
 
11.
Kelleher, B.P., Leahy, J.J., Henihan, A.M., O’Dwyer, T.F., Sutton, D. and Leahy, M.J.: Advances in poultry litter disposal technology - a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83 (2002) 27-36.
 
12.
Kirchmann, H. and Lundvall, A.: Treatment of solid animal manures: identification of low NH 3 emission practises. Nutr. Cycling in Agroecosyst. 51(1998)65-71.
 
13.
Koster, I.W. and Kooman, E.: Ammonia inhibition of the maximum growth rate ^m) of hydrogenotrophic methanogens at various pH-levels and temperatures, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28 (1988) 500-505.
 
14.
Koster, I.W., and Lettinga, G.: Anaerobic digestion at extreme ammonia concentration, Biological Wastes, 25 (1983) 51-59.
 
15.
Lü Fan, Chen Miao, He Pin-Jing, and Shao Li-Ming: Effects of ammonia on acidogenesis of protein-rich organic wastes, Environ. Engng. Sci. 25(1), 114-122. doi:10.1089/ees.2007.0042, 2008.
 
16.
Malina, J.F., and Pohland, F.D.: Design of Anaerobic Processes for the Treatment of Industrial and Municipal Wastes, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc. 7 (1992) 3-33.
 
17.
Mazur, Zb., and Mokra, O.: Macronutrient content of the natural fertilizers in the years 2003- 2005, Problem Papers Progress of Agricultural Sciences. 537 (2005) 243-247.
 
18.
Nakakubo R., M⊘ller H. B., Nielsen A. M., and Matsuda J.: Ammonia inhibition of methanogenesis and identification of process indicators during anaerobic digestion, Environ. Engng. Sci. 25(10) 1487-1496. doi:10.1089/ees.2007.0282, 2008.
 
19.
Niu, Q., Qiao, W., Qiang, H., Hojo, T., Li, Y.-Y.: Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: Stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 137 (2013) 358-367.
 
20.
Pechan, Z., Knappova, O., Petrovicova, B., Adamec, O.: Anaerobic digestion of poultry manure at high ammonium nitrogen concentrations. Biological Wastes 20 (1987) 117-131.
 
21.
Rynk, R.: (Ed.) On-farm Composting Handbook, NRAS-54 (NortheastRegional Agricultural Engineering Service), Cooperative Extension, Ithica, New York, 1992.
 
22.
Salminen, E., Rintala, J.: Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultryslaughterhouse waste - a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83 (2002a) 13-26.
 
23.
Salminen, E., Rintala, J.: Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solidpoultry slaughterhouse waste: effect of hydraulic retention time andloading, Water Resour. 36 (2002b) 3175-3182.
 
24.
Sobczak, J.: An attempt to use poultry manure as a filler for cement mortars. Problems of Agricultural Engineering. 3 (2008) 137-141.
 
25.
Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G., Han, X.: Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol., 120 (2012) 78-83.
 
26.
Webb, A. R., and Hawkes, F. R.: The anaerobic digestion of poultry manure: variation of gas yield with influent concentration and ammonium-nitrogen levels. Agricultural Wastes. 14 (2) (1985) 135-156.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top