ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Functional-Environmental Evaluation of Pocket Parks in Urbanized Areas - The Case Study of Gliwice
 
More details
Hide details
1
Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-01-05
 
 
Publication date: 2022-12-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2022;32(4):50-72
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The article presents the role and importance of creating new green areas in the areas of urban agglomerations. Particular attention was paid to the processes of creating new green areas in post-industrial areas and urban wastelands and their restoration for cities. The issue of the formation of pocket parks is raised and the results of the detailed research carried out by the authors in 2020 are briefly discussed. The article presents a comparative analysis of several selected examples of pocket parks, describes the role they play in cities. The purpose of the research was to determine what elements of pocket parks play an important role for the microclimate of cities and their communities. An example of the creation of a new pocket park in the city center of Gliwice, Poland is presented. The conclusions of the research and the evaluation of the experiment carried out by the authors can be useful for the creation of urban policies, planning of green areas in cities and the creation of utility-functional programs for new green areas.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Banzhaf, E, Arndt, T and Ladiges, J 2018. Potentials of urban brownfields for improving the quality of urban space. In: Kabisch, S, Koch, F, Gawel, E, Haase, A, Knapp, S, Krellenberg, K, Nivala, J, Zehnsdorf, A, (eds) Urban transformations, sustainable urban development through resource efficiency, quality of life and resilience. Future City 10. Springer, 221-232.
 
2.
Baur, JWR and Tynon, JF, 2010. Small-scale urban nature parks: why should we care? Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 32, 195–200.
 
3.
Blake, A 2005. Pocket Parks, Open Space Seattle 2100: Seattle, WA, USA, p. 3.
 
4.
Bradecki, T and Opania, S [ed.] 2021. Park kieszonkowy w Gliwicach. Studium możliwości aranżacji na centrum edukacji odpowiedzialności społecznej, edukacji ekologicznej i kulturalnej, [English: Pocket park in Gliwice. Possibility study for an education center for social responsibility, environmental and cultural education], Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
 
5.
Cohen, D,(and all) 2014. The Potential for Pocket Parks to Increase Physical Activity, National Institutes of Health (NIH), NIH Public Access, p. 19-26.
 
6.
Cutler, ME, Boyd D, Foody G M, and a. Vetrivel, 2012, Estimating tropical forest biomass with a combination of SAR image texture and Landsat TM data: An assessment of predictions between regions, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 70, pp. 66–77.
 
7.
El Aziz Noha, A 2015. Potentials of creating pocket parks in high density residential neighborhoods: The case of Rod El Farag, Cairo city, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, Vol. 4, number:7, p. 808-810.
 
8.
Elmqvist, T, Fragkias, M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio, PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell, S, Schewenius, M, Sendstad, M, Seto, KC and Wilkinson, C 2013, Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities, A Global Assessment, Springer Open.
 
9.
Gehl, J 2010. Cities for People, Island Press, Washinghton, Covehlo, London, 68.
 
10.
Grahn, P, Stigsdotter, UK 2003. Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2, 1–18.
 
11.
Hamin Infield Elisabeth, M, Abunnasr Yaser, Ryan Robert L [ed.] 2019. Planning for Climate Change: A Reader in Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Design for Resilient Cities,, Routledge.
 
12.
Harnik, P 2003, The Excellent City Park System: What Makes it Great and how to Get There, Trust for Public Land, p. 26-40.
 
13.
Harnik, P 2008,Creating and Maintaining Parks: Funding and Other Means, in Lewis M (Ed.). From Recreation to Re-Creation: New Directions in Parks and Open Space System Planning, American Planning Association, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 75-88.
 
14.
Izakovičová, Z, Petrovič, F, Pauditšová, E 2022, The Impacts of Urbanisation on Landscape and Environment: The Case of Slovakia. Sustainability, 14, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1401....
 
15.
Jennings, V, Browning, M H Rigolon, A, 2019, Urban Green Spaces: Public Health and Sustainability in the United States, Springer Briefs in Geography p. 71-93.
 
16.
Latif, Z A, Zamri, I, and Omar, H 2012, Determination of tree species using Worldview-2 data, 2012 IEEE 8th Int. Colloq. Signal Process. Its Appl., pp. 383–387.
 
17.
Lemes de Oliveira, F 2017, Green Wedge Urbanism: History, Theory and Contemporary Practice, Bloomsbury Academic.
 
18.
Maas, J, van Dillen, S.M.E., Verheij, RA, Groenewegen, PP 2009, Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place 15, 586–595.
 
19.
Mathey, J and Rößler, S 2022, Approaches to Developing Urban Wastelands as Elements of Green Infrastructure, [in:] Urban Wastelands: A Form of Urban Nature? [ed.:] Di Pietro F., Robert A., City and Nature, Springer, 273-294.
 
20.
Montaña Novoa, R 2013, Sustainable Green Spaces in the Compact City: The Provision of Adequate Green Spaces as a Solution to the Deterrents of City Centre Living, Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
 
21.
Nielsen, TS, Hansen, KB 2007. Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health & Place 13, 839–850.
 
22.
Peschardt, K K, Schipperijn, J, Stigsdotter, U K 2012, Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS), Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11(3), p. 235-244, 2012.
 
23.
Peschardta, KK, Schipperijnb, J, Stigsdotter, UK, 2012, Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS), Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11 (2012), 235–244.
 
24.
Puay Yok Tan, Chi Yung Jim[ed.:], 2017, Greening Cities: Forms and Functions, Springer.
 
25.
Schipperijn, J, Ekholm, O, Stigsdotter, UK, Toftager, M, Bentsen, P, Kamper-Jørgensen, F and Randrup, TB 2010a. Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape and Urban Planning 95, 130–137.
 
26.
Sustainable Communities Resource Center, “Turning Blighted Properties into Pocket Parks: Los Angeles Case Study”, Sustainable Communities E-News, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2012, źródło: https://archives.huduser.gov/s... (access: 2022.06.17).
 
27.
Wines, J 2000, Green Architecture, Benedikt Taschen Verlag GmbH, Koln.
 
28.
Yin, R K 2014, Studium przypadku w badaniach naukowych. Projektowanie i metody, [ Case Studies in Research. Design and methods ], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, s.48.
 
29.
Zachariasz, A 2005, Zieleń jako współczesny czynnik miastotwórczy ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli parków publicznych [Greenery as a contemporary city-forming factor with special emphasis on the role of public parks], Monografie, seria: Architektura, Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków.
 
30.
Zepf, M 2015, Greenery in the city: innovative and sustainable planning with urban flora, Jovis.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top