ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Dental Waste - Management and Statistics
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
Submission date: 2023-09-10
Final revision date: 2023-09-18
Acceptance date: 2023-09-18
Online publication date: 2023-09-26
Publication date: 2023-09-26
Corresponding author
Martyna Myszograj
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2023;33(2):55-63
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Waste management is a crucial issue in the contemporary world, playing a significant role in the fight against environmental problems. Inadequate waste management leads to the pollution of air, water, and soil with toxic and harmful substances and to the emission of greenhouse gases, thereby contributing to climate change, the reduction of biodiversity, and the destruction of ecosystems, as well as to the emergence of diseases and allergies in animals. The management of waste is primarily determined by its type and source, with recycling, incineration, and landfilling being the most common methods. The healthcare sector, with limited opportunities for waste reduction, has its own unique approach to waste management. In particular, dental waste presents a considerable environmental risk due to the hazardous and toxic substances it contains. A prime example of such substances is mercury (Hg), a toxic and bioaccumulative metal that was commonly used in dental amalgam for over a century. With the available statistical data, it is possible to recognize that dentistry can pose a serious threat to the environment, and steps can be taken to control and reduce the production of toxic waste and its potential impact on the environment.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Sausheva, OS 2017. Ecological footprint as an indicator of economic growth at the present stage of development. Russian J. of Resources, Conservation and Recycling 4, DOI:10.15862/13RRO417.
2.
Shershneva, EG 2022. Analysis of Correlation between Waste Accumulation and Countries Welfare Level. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 988, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/988/2/022034.
3.
Shilkina, SV 2020. Global trends in waste management and analysis of the situation in Russia. Russian J. of Resources, Conservation and Recycling 1, DOI: 10.15862/05ECOR120.
4.
Ermolaeva, Yu V 2017. Global waste management models: a sociological approach Scientific Result. Sociology and Management 3, 61–76.
5.
Fadaei, A 2022. Comparison of medical waste management methods in different countries: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health 18, 339–348.
6.
Hiltz, M 2007. The environmental impact of dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 73(1), 59–62.
7.
Farmer, GM, Stankiewicz, N, Michael, B, Wojcik, A, Lim Y and Ivkovic D 1997. Audit of waste collected over one week from ten dental practices. A pilot study. Aust Dent J 42(2), 114–117.
11.
Krishnappa, P, Sreekantaiah, P, Hiremath, SS, Thapsey, H, Shivraj, NS and Murthy, NS 2015. Quantification of Dental Health Care Waste Generated among Private Dental Practices in Bengaluru City. J Int Oral Health 7(6), 84–87.
12.
Antoniadou, M, Varzakas, T, Tzoutzas, I 2021. Circular Economy in Conjunction with Treatment Methodologies in the Biomedical and Dental Waste Sectors. Circ.Econ.Sust. 1, 563–592.
15.
Hylander, LD, Lindvall, A, Gahnberg, L 2006. High mercury emissions from dental clinics despite amalgam separators. Sci Total Environ 362(1-3), 74–84.
16.
Muhamedagic, B, Muhamedagic, L, Masic, I 2009. Dental office waste - public health and ecological risk. Mater Sociomed 21(1), 35–38.
19.
Chin, G, Chong, A, Kluczewska, A, Lau, A, Gorjy, S, Tennant M 2000. The environmental effects of dental amalgam. Australian Dental Journal, 246-249. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00258.x.
20.
Kao, RT, Dault, S, Pichay, T 2004. Understanding the mercury reduction issue: the impact of mercury on the environment and human health. J Calif Dent Assoc 32(7), 574–579.
21.
Barron, T 2004. Mercury in our environment. J Calif Dent Assoc 32(7), 556–563.
22.
Jones, DW 1999. Exposure or absorption and the crucial question of limits for mercury. J Can Dent Assoc 65(1), 42–46.
23.
Vandeven, JA, McGinnis, SL 2004. Cost-effectiveness of removing amalgam from dental wastewater. J Calif Dent Assoc 32(7), 564–73.
24.
Martin, N, Mulligan, S, Fuzesi, P, Hatton P.V 2022. Quantification of single use plastics waste generated in clinical dental practice and hospital settings. Journal of Dentistry 118, 103948.