ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Digital Analysis of Geo-Referenced Concrete Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Images
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains, Malaysia
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-08-20
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2020;30(2):65-79
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The microstructural evaluation of complex cementitious materials has been made possible by the microscopic imaging tools such as Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and X-Ray Microanalysis. Particularly, the application of concrete SEM imaging and digital image analysis have become common in the analysis and mapping of concrete technology. In this study, six samples of two-dimensional (2D) SEM images were spatially resampled to produce Geo-referenced SEM sample images. Subsequently, they were analyzed and the intensity histogram plot was produced to facilitate visual interpretation. The consecutive digital image analysis performed was the enhancement and noise removal process using two filtering methods i.e. median and adaptive box filter. The filtered resampled images, then undergone the unsupervised K-Means classification process to collectively separate each individual pixel corresponds to the spectral data. By spatial segmentation of K-Means algorithms, the cluster groups generated were carefully reviewed before proceeding to the final analysis. From the resulting data, the mapping of the spatial distribution of k-cluster and the quantification of micro-cracks (voids) were performed. The results of the SEM images (1st - 4th sample) showed a higher percentage of k-cluster data indicating a good correlation with the major elemental composition of EDX analysis, namely Oxide (O), Silicon (Si) and Carbon (C). Meanwhile, the subjective visual assessment of the image (5th and 6th sample) has confirmed the micro-crack developments on the concrete SEM images upon which the crack density was 3.02 % and 1.30 %, respectively.
 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Weerheijm, J Editor(s) 2013. Introduction to concrete: a resilient material system, In Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, Understanding the Tensile Properties of Concrete, Woodhead Publishing, 1-15.
 
2.
Scrivener, K, Snellings, R and Lothenbach, B 2016. A Practical Guide to Microstructural Analysis of Cementitious Materials, CRC Press, 1 st Edition, 540 pp.
 
3.
Giannuzzi, L 2018. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, 4th Edition, Springer, 550 pp.
 
4.
Leite, M and Monteiro, P 2016. Microstructural analysis of recycled concrete using x-ray microtomography. Cement and Concrete Research 81, 38–48.
 
5.
Kong, Y, Wang, P, Liu, S, Zhao, G and Peng, Y 2016. SEM analysis of the interfacial transition zone between cement-glass powder paste and aggregate of mortar under microwave curing. Materials 9(9), 733.
 
6.
Narasimha, R and Ahmed N 2019. Experimental study on TGA, XRD and SEM Analysis of Concrete with Ultrafine Slag. International Journal of Engineering, IJE Transactions B: Applications 32(5), 679-684.
 
7.
Mehran, Y and Katayoon S 2014. Automated segmentation of concrete images into microstructures: A comparative study. Computers and Concrete 14(3), 315-325.
 
8.
Lucas, D, Mauro, D, Samuel, M, Sébastien L and Jocelyn, C 2015. Semi-Automatic Classification of Cementitious Materials using Scanning Electron Microscope Images. Journal of Electronic Imaging 24(6), 061109.
 
9.
Zhu, X, Yuan, Y, Li, L, Du, Y and Li, F 2017. Identification of interfacial transition zone in asphalt concrete based on nano-scale metrology techniques. Materials & Design 129, 91–102.
 
10.
Zhang, L, Zhang, Y, Liu, C, Liu, L and Tang, K 2017. Study on microstructure and bond strength of interfacial transition zone between cement paste and high-performance lightweight aggregates prepared from ferrochromium slag. Construction and Building Materials 142, 31-41.
 
11.
Vargas, P, Restrepo-Baena, O and Tobón, J.I 2017. Microstructural analysis of interfacial transition zone (ITZ) and its impact on the compressive strength of lightweight concretes. Construction and Building Materials 137, 381–389.
 
12.
Arun, M and Sumathi, P 2018. Crack detection using image processing: A critical review and analysis, Alexandria Engineering Journal 57(2), 787-798.
 
13.
Alam, S.Y, Loukili, A.F and Grondin, E.R 2015. Use of the digital image correlation and acoustic emission technique to study the effect of structural size on cracking of reinforced concrete. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 143, 17-31.
 
14.
Romulo, G.L and Sidney, N. G 2016. Automatic crack detection and measurement based on image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 65(3), 583-590.
 
15.
Wang, D, Shi, C, Wu, Z, Xiao, J, Huang, Z and Fang, Z 2015. A Review on Ultra High-Performance Concrete: Part II. Hydration, Microstructure and Properties, Journal of Construction and Building Materials 96, 368-377.
 
16.
Li, J.J, Niu, J.G, Wan, C.J, Jin, B and Yin, Y. L 2016. Investigation on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of High-Performance Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, Journal of Construction and Building Materials 118, 27-35.
 
17.
Shen, W, Liu, Y, Cao, L, Huo, X, Yang, Z, Zhou, C, He, P and Lu, Z 2017. Mixing Design and Microstructure of Ultra High Strength Concrete with Manufactured Sand, Journal of Construction and Building Materials 143, 312-321.
 
18.
Rakhi, C, Parneet, K.R and Navneet, S.R 2011. Spatial Domain based Image Enhancement Techniques for Scanned Electron Microscope (SEM) images. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science 8(4/2), 580-586.
 
19.
Buckman, J, Bankole, S.A, Zihms, S, Lewis, H, Couples, G and Corbett, P. W 2017. Quantifying Porosity through Automated Image Collection and Batch Image Processing: Case Study of Three Carbonates and an Aragonite Cemented Sandstone. Geosciences 7(3), 70.
 
20.
Yu, C, Sun, W and Karen, S. J 2014. Application of image analysis based on SEM and chemical mapping on PC mortars under sulfate attack. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. 29(3), 534–539.
 
21.
Paul, E.S, Jeffrey, W. B, and Pan Feng 2015. Quantitative Imaging of Clinker and Cement Microstructure. National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1877, 46 pp.
 
22.
Meulenyzer, S.P, Chanussot, J, Crombez, S and Chen J.J 2013. Spectral–spatial image processing strategies for classifying multi-spectral SEM–EDS X-RAY maps of supplementary cementitious materials. 14 th Euroseminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials, (EMABM). Helsingor, Denmark.
 
23.
Bhabatosh, C and Dutta, D 2011. Digital Image Processing and Analysis, Prentice-Hall, India. 2 nd edition. 365 pp.
 
24.
Wu, Q, Merchant, F and Castleman, K. (eds). Microscope Image Processing, Elsevier Academic Press. 2010.
 
25.
Annadurai, S 2007. Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Pearson, India,440 pp.
 
26.
Krig S 2014. Image Pre-Processing. Computer Vision Metrics. A press, Berkeley, CA.,39-83.
 
27.
Wong, H.S, Head, M.K and Buenfeld, N.R 2006. Pore segmentation of cement-based materials from backscattered electron images. Cement & Concrete Research 36(6), 1083-1090.
 
28.
Ezoji, M and Iravani, S 2016. A General Framework for 1-D Histogram-based Image Contrast Enhancement, IJE Transactions A: Basics 29(10), 1384-1391.
 
29.
Tuzlukov, V. Signal Processing Noise, CRC Press, United States. 2002. 688 pp.
 
30.
Timischl, F, Date, M and Nemoto, S 2012. A Statistical Model of Signal–noise in Scanning Electron Microscopy. Scanning 34(3), 137-144.
 
31.
Marturi, N, Dembélé, S and Piat, N 2014. Scanning Electron Microscope Image Signal-to-Noise Ratio Monitoring for Micro-Nanomanipulation. Scanning 36(4), 419-429.
 
32.
Rajvardhan, O 2016. A Study of Digital Image Segmentation Techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science 5(12), 19779-19783.
 
33.
Li, Y, Guo, W and Li, H 2016. Quantitative Analysis on Ground Blast Furnace Slag Behavior in Hardened Cement Pastes Based on Backscattered Electron Imaging and Image Analysis Technology, Construction and Building Materials 110(1), 48-53.
 
34.
Vidal, M, Ostra, M, Imaz, N, García-Lecina, E and Ubide, C 2016. Analysis of SEM Digital Images to Quantify Crack Network Pattern Area in Chromium Electrodeposits, Surface and Coatings Technology 285(1), 289-297.
 
35.
Drumetz, L, Dalla Mura, M, Meulenyzer, S, Lombard, S and Chanussot, J 2015. Semi-Automatic Classification of Cementitious Materials Using Scanning Electron Microscope Images, Journal of Electronic Imaging 24(6), 1-53.
 
36.
Gopan, V and Wins, K 2016. Quantitative Analysis of Grinding Wheel Loading Using Image Processing. Procedia Technology 25(1), 885-891.
 
37.
Campbell, A, Murray, P, Yakushina, E, Marshall, S and Ion, W 2018. New Methods for Automatic Quantification of Microstructural Features Using Digital Image Processing. Materials & Design. 141(1), 395-406.
 
38.
Meulenyzer, S, Chanussot, J, Chen, J and Crombez, S. Spectral-Spatial Image Processing Strategies for Classifying Multispectral SEM-EDS X-Ray Maps of Cementitious Materials. Proceedings of 14 th Euroseminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials (EMABM), Helsingor, Denmark, 2013, 1-4.
 
39.
Angelin, A, Da Silva, F, Barbosa, L, Lintz, R, De Carvalho, M and Franco, R 2017. Voids Identification in Rubberized Mortar Digital Images Using K-Means and Watershed Algorithms. Journal of Cleaner Production 164(4), 455-464.
 
40.
Soroushian, P, Elzafraney, M and Nossoni, A 2003. Specimen Preparation and Image Processing and Analysis Techniques for Automated Quantification of Concrete Microcracks and Voids, Cement and Concrete Research 33(12), 1949-1962.
 
41.
Eliason, E and Mcewen, A 1990. Adaptive Box Filters for Removal of Random Noise from Digital Images. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 56(4),453-458.
 
42.
Wu, J 2012. Advances in K-means Clustering, Springer Theses, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.178 pp.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top