ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Classification of Functional Elements of Green Infrastructure as Key Indicators of Sustainable Development in Residential Areas of Green Cities: Evidence from Olsztyn in Northeast Poland.
1
Department of Land Management, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
3
Bioeconomy Research Institute, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-05-16
Final revision date: 2025-06-24
Acceptance date: 2025-07-03
Online publication date: 2025-09-04
Publication date: 2025-09-04
Corresponding author
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2025;35(4):1-24
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Residential green spaces are one of the key factors determining the quality of life for urban inhabitants, as well as an important element of the functional and spatial structure of cities. Their presence within the system of urban green and blue infrastructure contributes to improving microclimatic conditions, increasing water retention, and enhancing biodiversity, making them a vital aspect of sustainable urban development. Unfortunately, there is a lack of studies classifying green infrastructure elements in green cities, which motivated the authors to undertake this particular research topic. This study analyzes the types and forms of residential greenery from a functional and spatial perspective and assesses the degree of green space development based on three residential districts of Olsztyn: Jaroty, Pojezierze, and Kormoran. The specific objective of the research was to identify areas with development potential for green infrastructure within the studied residential neighborhoods and to provide corresponding recommendations. The research involved classifying greenery according to its functions, evaluating its accessibility, and assessing its integration with the built environment. Methods employed included spatial analysis, field surveys, observation, and both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of residential greenery. The results indicate a varied level of functional diversity and accessibility of green spaces across the studied neighborhoods. Based on the findings, recommendations were made to improve the management of green spaces, including the introduction of new green areas, supplementation of existing ones, and modification of their functions.
REFERENCES (57)
1.
Ababneh, A 2023. Smart urban management of green space. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 4(3), 339–353.
2.
Akpinar, A, Barbosa-Leiker, C and Brooks, KR 2016. Does green space matter? Exploring relationships between green space type and health indicators, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20, 407-418.
3.
Akshay, K 2024. Urban green spaces and their role in enhancing quality of life. i-manager's Journal on Structural Engineering 12(4), 33-42.
4.
Aleksejeva, J, Voulgaris, G and Gasparatos, A 2024. Systematic review of the climatic and non-climatic benefits of green roofs in urban areas. Urban Climate 58, 102133.
5.
Almusaed, A 2011. The Green Areas Benefits Upon Urban Sustainability Role. In: Biophilic and Bioclimatic Architecture. Springer, London. 151-157.
6.
Anguelovski, I, Connolly, JJT, Masip, L and Pearsall, H 2017. Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geography 39(3), 458–491.
7.
Aronson, MFJ, Lepczyk, CA, Evans, KL, Goddard, MA, Lerman, SB and MacIvor, JS 2017. Biodiversity in the city: Key challenges for urban green space management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15(4), 189–196.
8.
Battisti, L, Larcher, F and Devecchi, M 2023. Urban green management plan: Guidelines for European cities. 2, 1105159.
9.
Beatley, T 2011. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review. Island Press. 23(1).
10.
Bertram, C and Rehdanz, K 2015. The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecological Economics 120, 139-152,.
11.
Braçe, O 2018. Effects of Urban Expansion in the Choice of Commuting Modes by the Population of Metropolitan Areas. Revista De Estudios Andaluces 36(36), 30–32.
12.
Braga, WRdeO, Marques, MD, da Silva Quatroque, VHS and Morales, AG 2024. Cidade Ideal e Cidade Real: Uma reflexão sobre cidades sustentáveis. Fórum Ambiental Da Alta Paulista 20(4), 79-93.
13.
Breuste, J 2022. What Constitutes Urban Nature in the Green City Concept? In: The Green City. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 255–314.
14.
Breuste, J, Artmann, M, Iojă, C and Qureshi, S 2020. Making Green Cities: Concepts, Challenges and Practice. In: Making Green Cities. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1-15.
15.
Buijs, AE, Mattijssen, TJM, Van der Jagt, APN, Ambrose-Oji, B, Andersson, E, Elands, BHM and Møller, MS 2016. Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22, 1–6.
16.
Czyża, S and Kowalczyk, A 2024. Applying GIS in Blue-Green Infrastructure Design in Urban Areas for Better Life Quality and Climate Resilience. Sustainability 16(12), 5187.
17.
Dawidowicz, A, Kulawiak, M and Ogryzek, M 2022. Is it possible to create a unified urban greenery management system (UGMS) on a national scale? The concept for EU Member State of Poland. Environmental Science & Policy 145, 73-92.
18.
Fuller, R and Gaston, K 2009. The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biology Letters 5, 352 - 355.
19.
Gill, SE, Handley, JF, Ennos, AR and Pauleit, S 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment 33(1), 115–133.
20.
Haase, D, Kabisch, N, Haase, A and Andersson, E 2017. Greening cities – To be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat International 64, 41–48.
21.
Herath, P and Bai, X 2024. Benefits and co-benefits of urban green infrastructure for sustainable cities: six current and emerging themes. Sustainability Science 19, 1039–1063.
22.
Jaszczak A, Kristianova K, Pochodyła E and Vaznoniene G 2020. New “Revolution” - Green Solutions In Urban Design, World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium – WMCAUS 2020 Prague, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 960: 022014.
23.
Jim, CY and Chen, WY 2009. Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities 26(4), 187–194.
24.
Jim, C 2013. Sustainable urban greening strategies for compact cities in developing and developed economies. Urban Ecosystems 16, 741-761.
25.
Kabisch, N and Haase, D 2014. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning 122, 129–139.
26.
Kabisch, N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn H, Stadler J, Zaunberger K and Bonn, A 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society 21(2):39.
27.
Kabisch, N, Qureshi, S and Haase, D 2015. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces—A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50, 25–34.
28.
Kimic, K and Ostrysz, K 2021. Assessment of Blue and Green Infrastructure Solutions in Shaping Urban Public Spaces—Spatial and Functional, Environmental, and Social Aspects. Sustainability 13(19), 11041.
29.
Kochel, L and Zieliński, M 2021. Tereny zieleni a potencjał rekreacyjno-wypoczynkowy na przykładzie Krakowa, [Green areas and recreacional and leisure potential on the example of Krakow] Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury PAN Oddział w Krakowie, Urbanity and Architecture Files Tom XLIX/2021 s. 47–78.
30.
Kondracki, J 1998. Geografia regionalna Polski. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN , wyd. 2002.
31.
Krekel, C, Kolbe, J and Wüstemann, H 2016. The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecological Economics 121, 117-127.
32.
Lennon, M 2015. Green infrastructure and planning policy: A critical assessment. Local Environment 20(8), 957–980.
33.
McCormick, R 2017. Does Access to Green Space Impact the Mental Well-being of Children: A Systematic Review, Journal of Pediatric Nursing 37: 3-7.
34.
McDonald, R, Aronson, M, Beatley, T, Beller, E, Bazo, M, Grossinger, R, Jessup, K, Mansur, A, De Oliveira, J, Panlasigui, S, Burg, J, Pevzner, N, Shanahan, D, Stoneburner, L, Rudd, A and Spotswood, E 2023. Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People and Nature 5(1), 84-102.
35.
McGuirk, PM and Argent, N 2011. Population growth and change: implications for Australia’s cities and regions. Geographical Research 49(3), 317–335.
36.
Nancy, SJ and Hafiz, R 2023. Densification vs Environmental Sustainability: A Study of the Residential Areas of Dhaka. Global Journal of Human Social Science 23(B3), 37–50.
37.
Oględzka, E 2020. Prawne aspekty planowania terenów zieleni w miastach. [Legal aspects of urban green areas planning] Studia Miejskie 2, 267–283.
38.
Palliwoda, J, Heim, A and Lausch, A 2020. Urban green spaces—A review of approaches to access and use. Landscape and Urban Planning 195, 103706.
39.
Pantaloni, M, Marinelli, G, Santilocchi, R, Minelli, A, and Neri, D 2022. Sustainable Management Practices for Urban Green Spaces to Support Green Infrastructure: An Italian Case Study. Sustainability 14(7), 4243.
40.
Profiroiu, CM, Bodislav, DA, Burlacu, S and Radulescu, CV 2020. Challenges of Sustainable Urban Development in the Context of Population Growth. European Journal of Sustainable Development 9(3), 51.
41.
Rambhia, M, Schultmann, F, Volk, R, Winter, S and Rismanchi, B 2024. Prioritizing urban green spaces in resource constrained scenarios. Resources, Environment and Sustainability 16, 100150.
42.
Raszeja, E and Gałecka-Drozda, A 2020. Współczesna interpretacja idei poznańskiego systemu zieleni miejskiej w kontekście strategii miasta zrównoważonego. [A contemporary interpretation of the concept of the Poznań urban green system in view of the sustainable city strategy] Studia Miejskie 19, 75–86.
43.
Ritesh, R and Mohammed, F 2021. Green Cities. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 1-11.
44.
Staniszewska, L 2022. Zarządzanie zielenią w miejscowym planie zagospodarowania przestrzennego. [Greenery management in the local land use plan] Samorząd Terytorialny 7-8, 109–121.
45.
Stanković, N 2024. The role of urban green corridors in strengthening the sustainability and resilience of cities to climate change. Urbanism and sustainable development. 195-204.
46.
Studziżór, K and Kwiatek-Sołtys, A 2021. Zieleń miejska w dzielnicy Podgórze Duchackie w Krakowie – własność gruntów, zagospodarowanie i ocena mieszkańców. [Urban greenery in the Pogdórze Duchackie district in Krakow – land ownership, spatial development and inhabitants opinion] Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Geographica 16, 74–87.
47.
Swensen, G and Berg, S 2020. The ‘garden city’ in the green infrastructure of the future: learning from the past. Landscape Research 45, 802-818.
48.
Szumigała, KO, Kozaczko, M and Szumigała, PP 2023. Możliwości adaptacyjne poznańskich powojennych osiedli mieszkaniowych do zmian klimatu. [Adaptation possibilities of Poznań’s post-war housing estates to climate change] Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 15(64), 189–212.
49.
Tappert, S, Klöti, T and Drilling, M 2018. Contested urban green spaces in the compact city: The (re-)negotiation of urban gardening in Swiss cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 170, 69-78.
50.
Taylor, L and Hochuli, DF 2017. Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines, Landscape and Urban Planning 158, 25-38.
51.
Tomczak, A and Szoszkiewicz, J 2023. The idea of the garden – city in Polish urban planning thought at the beginning of the 20th century. BUILDER 317(12), 48-53.
52.
Tzoulas, K, Korpela, K, Venn, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V, Kaźmierczak, A, Niemela, J and James, P 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review, Landscape and Urban Planning 81(3), 167-178.
53.
Van den Bosch, M and Ode Sang, Å 2017. Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health - A systematic review of reviews. Environ Research 158, 373-384.
54.
Veal, AJ and Piracha, A 2022. Meeting the need for a rational basis for open space and recreation planning in new high density residential areas: the Recreational Activity Benchmark model. Australian Planner 58(1–2), 63–68.
55.
Wolch, JR, Byrne, J and Newell, JP 2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’, Landscape and Urban Planning 125, 234-244.
56.
Yannis, G and Chaziris, A 2022. Transport System and Infrastructure. Transportation Research Procedia 60, 6–11.
57.
Zabel, A and Häusler, M 2024. Policy instruments for green infrastructure. Landscape and Urban Planning 242, 104929.
| eISSN: | 2450-8594 |
| ISSN: | 2080-5187 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
