Estimation of the Hydraulic Width of the Subcatchment Depending on the Degree of Detail of the Drainage System Model

The article presents the current state of knowledge in the field of estimating preliminary values of storm water subcatchment calibration parameters in the case of using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) for building a model of storm water drainage system. The key issue is estimating the runoff width in the case of reducing the network structure and storm water catchments due to the shortening of calculation time and simplification of the model calibration process. Correction of one of the recommended literature methods has been proposed. The assessment was based on the real catchment model with single and multi-family housing. It was found possible to apply the proposed method in the case of reducing systems connected in series.

REFERENCES (14)

Cambez, MJ, Pinho, J and David, LM 2008. Using SWMM 5 in the continuous modelling of stormwater hydraulics and quality. 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 1-10.

Google Scholar

Choi, K and Ball, JE 2002. Parameter estimation for urban runoff modelling. Urban Water 4, 31-41.

Google Scholar

Huber, WC and Dickinson, RE 1992. Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 4, EPA/600/3-88/001a. Athens, Greece: US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory.

Google Scholar

Javaheri H 1998. Automatic calibration of urban run-off models using global optimization techniques, Montreal, Canada: McGill University.

Google Scholar

Kotowski A 2015. Basics of safe dimensioning of drainage areas [Podstawy bezpiecznego wymiarowania odwodnień terenów]. Warszawa: Seidel-Przywecki.

Google Scholar

Kroll, S, Wambecq, T, Weemaes, M, Van Impe, J and Willems, P 2017. Semi-automated buildup and calibration of conceptual sewer models. Environmental Modelling & Software 93, 344-355.

Google Scholar

Liong, SY, Chan, WT and Lum, LH 1991. Knowledge-based system for SWMM runoff component calibration. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 117 (5), 507-524.

Google Scholar

Nowakowska, M, Kaźmierczak, B, Kotowski, A and Wartalska, K 2017. Identification, Calibration and Validation of Hydrodynamic Model of Urban Drainage System in the example of the City of Wroclaw. Ochrona środowiska 39 (2), 51-60.

Google Scholar

Nowogoński, I 2018. Verification of the simulation model based on the example of combined sewage system in Głogów. Civil and environmental engineering reports 28 (3), 111-120.

Google Scholar

10.

Nowogoński, I and Ogiołda, E (2018). Verification of the combined sewage system simulation model based on the example of the city of Głogów. E3S Web of Conferences 45 (58), 1-8.

Google Scholar

11.

Rossman, LA 2015. Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 5.1, EPA/600/R-14/413b. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA: US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory.

Google Scholar

12.

Skotnicki, M and Sowiński M 2009. Verification of subcatchment hydraulic width evaluation method exemplified by real urban catchment [Weryfikacja metody wyznaczania szerokości hydraulicznej zlewni cząstkowej na przykładzie wybranej zlewni miejskiej]. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Inżynieria Środowiska, 57, 27-43.

Google Scholar

13.

Tavousi, M, Honarbakhsh, H and Yazd, HGH 2006. Analysis of the Sensitivity of the Variables Affecting Urban Flood through Two Rational and SWMM Methods by SSA. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 4, 362-370.

Google Scholar

14.

Temprano, J, Arango, Ó, Cagiao, J, Suárez, J and Tejero, I 2006. Stormwater quality calibration by SWMM: A case study in Northern Spain. Water SA 32, 55-63.

Google Scholar

Submit your paper

eISSN:	2450-8594
ISSN:	2080-5187