ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Damage Identification of a Steel Plate Using Vibration Methods
1
Department of Mechanics and Building Structures
Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering
Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Submission date: 2024-10-19
Final revision date: 2024-10-29
Acceptance date: 2024-11-13
Online publication date: 2024-11-25
Publication date: 2024-11-25
Corresponding author
Edyta Kowalska
Department of Mechanics and Building Structures Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Heweliusza 4, 10-724, Olsztyn, Poland
Department of Mechanics and Building Structures Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Heweliusza 4, 10-724, Olsztyn, Poland
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2024;34(4):360-371
KEYWORDS
vibration-based damage identification methodnon-destructive testingstructural health monitoringimpulse teststeel plate
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an experimental study on the detection and localization of damage in a steel plate using vibration-based methods. Dynamic impulse tests were conducted on both undamaged and damaged plate to determine changes in modal parameters, such as eigenfrequencies and mode shapes. Several damage detection methods, including the Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC), Coordinate Modal Assurance Criterion (COMAC), Mode Shape Curvature (MSC), Mode Shape Curvature Square (MSCS), and Damage Index (DI), were applied. The results showed that while MAC and COMAC effectively detected damage, they did not provide information about the location. MSC and MSCS indices demonstrated improved damage localization, with the MSCS being particularly effective. The DI index provided the clearest and most accurate representation of the damage location. These findings highlight the potential of these methods for non-destructive testing and structural health monitoring.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Allemang, RJ 2003. The modal assurance criterion - Twenty years of use and abuse. Sound and vibration 37(8), 14–21.
2.
Avci, O et al. 2021. A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 147, 107077.
3.
Bru, D, Ivorra, S and Camassa, D 2023. Experimental Damage Identification in Masonry Structures by OMA. IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment, 263–268.
4.
Choi, FC et al. 2008. Application of the modified damage index method to timber beams. Engineering Structures 30(4), 1124–1145.
5.
Das, S et al. 2016. Vibration-based damage detection techniques used for health monitoring of structures: a review. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring 6, 477–507.
6.
Doebling, SW et al. 1998. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest 30(2), 91–105.
7.
Ewins, DJ 2000. Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application. University of Michigan: Wiley.
8.
Ewins, DJ 2000. Model validation: correlation for updating. Sadhana - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences 25(3), 221–234.
9.
Ho, YK and Ewins, DJ 2000. On the structural damage identification with mode shapes. European COST F3 Conference on System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid, Spain, 677–686.
10.
Lieven, NAJ and Ewins, DJ 1988. Spatial correlation of mode shapes: the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC). Proceedings of the 6th International Modal Analysis Conference, Kissimmee Florida, USA, 690–695.
11.
Maeck, J and De Roeck, G 1999. Damage Detection on a Prestressed Concrete Bridge and RC Beams Using Dynamic System Identification. Damage Assessment of Structures, Proceedings of DAMAS 99, Dublin, Ireland, 320–327.
12.
Maeck, J and De Roeck, G 2003. Damage assessment using vibration analysis on the Z24-bridge. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 17(1), 133–142.
13.
Magalhães, F et al. 2012. Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 28, 212–228.
14.
Magalhães, F 2010. Operational modal analysis for testing and monitoring of bridges and special structures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Porto, 1–297.
15.
Maia, NMM, Silva, JMM and To, WM 1997. Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis. Research Studies Press, Taunton.
16.
Masciotta, M et al. 2017. Damage Identification and Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Historic Masonry Chimney. Annals of geophysics 60(4).
17.
Navabian, N et. al 2016. Damage identification in plate-like structure using mode shape derivatives. Archive of Applied Mechanics 86(5), 1-14.
18.
Oyarzo-Vera, C and Chouw, N 2017. Damage Identification of Unreinforced Masonry Panels Using Vibration-Based Techniques. Shock and Vibration 2017, 1-14.
19.
Pallarés, F et al. 2021. Structural health monitoring (SHM) and Nondestructive testing (NDT) of slender masonry structures: A practical review. Construction and Building Materials 297, 123768.
20.
Pandey, AK et al. 1991. Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. Journal of Sound and Vibration 145(2), 321-332.
21.
Ramos, L et al. 2010. Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 24(5), 1291–1305.
22.
Reynders, EPB 2012. System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 19(1), 51–124.
23.
Rucka, M and Wilde, K 2012. Dynamika budowli z przykładami w środowisku MATLAB. [Dynamics of structures with examples in the MATLAB environment.] Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej.
24.
Schwarz, BJ and Richardson, MH 1999. Experimental modal analysis. CSI Reliability Week, Orlando, Florida, USA.
25.
Stubbs, N et al. 1992. An Efficient and Robust Algorithm for Damage Localization in Offshore Platforms. Proc. ASCE Tenth Structures Congress, 543–546.
26.
Stubbs, N et. al 1995. Field Verification of a Nondestructive Damage Localization and Severity Estimation Algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XIII), 182, 210–218.
27.
Sun, X et. al 2023. A Review on Vibration-Based Damage Detection Methods for Civil Structures. Vibration 6(4), 843–875.
28.
Verma, SK et. al 2012. Review of Nondestructive Testing Methods for Condition Monitoring of Concrete Structures. Journal of Construction Engineering 2013, 1-11.
29.
West, WM 1986. Illustration of the use of modal assurance criterion to detect structural changes in an Orbiter test specimen. In Proceedings of the Air Force Conference on Aircraft Structural Integrity, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA, 3–6 February 1986.
30.
Zhong, H and Yang, M 2016. Damage detection for plate-like structures using generalized curvature mode shape method. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring 6(1), 141-152.
31.
Zielińska, M and Rucka, M 2018. Non-Destructive Assessment of Masonry Pillars using Ultrasonic Tomography. Materials 11(12), 2543.
32.
Żółtowski, M et al. 2023. Vibration Signal Diagnostic Information of Reinforced Masonry Elements Destruction. Applied Sciences 13(8), 4913.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2450-8594 |
| ISSN: | 2080-5187 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
