ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Assessment of Natural Ventilation System for a Typical Residential House in Poland
 
More details
Hide details
1
Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Narutowicza st 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2016-10-21
 
 
Publication date: 2016-09-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2016;22(3):25-44
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the research results of field measurements campaign of natural ventilation performance and effectiveness in a residential building. The building is located in the microclimate whose parameters differ significantly in relation to a representative weather station. The measurement system recorded climate parameters and the physical variables characterizing the air flow in the rooms within 14 days of the winter season. The measurement results showed that in spite of proper design and construction of the ventilation system, unfavorable microclimatic conditions that differed from the predicted ones caused significant reduction in the efficiency of the ventilation system. Also, during some time periods, external climate conditions caused an opposite air flow direction in the vent inlets and outlets, leading to a significant deterioration of air quality and thermal comfort measured by CO2 concentration and PMV index in a residential area.
 
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Awbi H. “Ventilation of building”, E & FN Spon, 2003.
 
2.
Burek R, Połednik B, Raczkowski A. “Study of the relationship between the perceived air quality and the specific enthalpy of air polluted by people”, Archiwum Ochrony Środowiska 2006.
 
3.
Chu CR, Chiu YH, Wang YW. “An experiment study of wind-driven cross ventilation in partitioned buildings”, Energy and Buildings 2010; 42: 667-673.
 
4.
Clarke D., “A breath of fresh air”, Hospital Development. 32(11), (2001): 13-17.
 
5.
Etheridge D. “Natural Ventilation of Buildings: Theory, Measurement and Design”, John Wiley&Sons 2011.
 
6.
Etheridge D, Sandberg M. ”Building Ventilation: Theory and Measurement”, John Wiley and Sons; 1996.
 
7.
Fanger P, Toftum J,"Extension of the PMV model to non-airconditioned buildings in warm climates", Energy and Buildings 34 (2002).
 
8.
Fountain M, Huizenga C, "A thermal sensation model for use by the engineering profession, Results of Cooperative Research Between ASHRAE and Environmental Analytics", ASHRAE RP-781 Final Report, Piedmont, 1995.
 
9.
Gratia E, Bruyere I, De Herde A. “How to use natural ventilation to cool narrow office buildings”, Building and Environment 2004; 39: 1157-1170.
 
10.
Humphreys M, Nicol J, "The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments", Energy and Buildings 34 (2002).
 
11.
Jones BW, "Capabilities and limitations of thermal models for use in thermal comfort standards", Energy and Buildings 34 (2002).
 
12.
Kleiven T. "Natural Ventilation in Buildings. Architectural concepts, consequences and possibilities", Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doktor at Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art Department of Architectural Design, History and Technology, 2003.
 
13.
Krishan A., “Climate responsive architecture: a design handbook for energy efficient buildings”, Tata McGraw-Hill Pub. Co., New York, 2001.
 
14.
Lau J, Chen Q. “Energy analysis for workshops with floor-supply displacement ventilation under the U.S. climates”, Energy and Buildings 2006; 38: 1212-1219.
 
15.
Martin, A. and J. Fitzsimmons. "Making Natural Ventilation Work". Guidance Note GN 7/2000. BSRIA, 2000.
 
16.
Mochida A, Yoshino H, Takeda T, Kakegawa T, Miyauchi S. “Methods for controlling airflow in and around a building under cross ventilation to improve indoor thermal comfort”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2005; 93: 437-449.
 
17.
Ravikumar P, Prakash D, "Analysis of thermal comfort in a residential room with insect proof screen: A case study by numerical simulation methods", Building Simulation 4 (2011).
 
18.
Redlich C., “Sick-building syndrome”, Sparer J & Cullen M. R. (1997).
 
19.
Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure dated 12.04.2002 on technical conditions for buildings and location of buildings.
 
20.
Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure dated 13.02.2003 on technical conditions for buildings and location of buildings.
 
21.
Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure dated 07.04.2004 on technical conditions for buildings and location of buildings.
 
22.
Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure dated 12.03.2009 on technical conditions for buildings and location of buildings.
 
23.
Rim D, Novoselac A. “Ventilation effectiveness as an indicator of occupant exposure to particles from indoor sources”, Building and Environment, 2009.
 
24.
Santamouris M, Wouters P. “Building Ventilation: The state of the art”, Earthscan; 2006.
 
25.
Steen Larsen T, "Natural Ventilation Driven by Wind and Temperature Difference", PhD Thesis defended public at Aalborg University 020206, 2006.
 
26.
Tsutsumia H, Tanabea S, Harigayaa J, Iguchib Y, Nakamura G. “Effect of humidity on human comfort and productivity after step changes from warm and humid environment”, Building and Environment, 2006.
 
27.
PN-B-03430:1983. Ventilation in residential houses and public buildings - Requirements.
 
28.
EN ISO 15927-4. Hygrothermal performance of buildings - Calculation and presentation of climatic data - Part 4 Data for assessing the annual energy for cooling and heating systems.
 
29.
ISO 7730:2005, Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, International Organization for Standarization, Geneva, 2005.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top