ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Arrangement of Air Pollution Sensors in a Lowland Town
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Econometrics, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
 
2
Institute of Mathematics, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
 
3
Institute of Environmental Engineering, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-05-22
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-09-04
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-09-17
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-09-22
 
 
Publication date: 2026-09-22
 
 
Corresponding author
Jacek Bojarski   

Institute of Mathematics, University of Zielona Gora, Licealna, 65-417, Zielona Góra, Poland
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2026;36(3):118-129
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Air pollution is one of the most pressing environmental challenges to public health worldwide. Investigating this problem requires recognizing the distribution of pollution composition and intensity. Therefore, air monitoring systems become more common in big cities worldwide. However, smaller urban centers are frequently overlooked in the literature despite facing similar health risks. The main purpose of this work is to bridge this gap by providing a cost-effective, replicable framework applicable to any lowland town with a limited budget. The proposed monitoring system is a scalable, hybrid network of sensors integrated into the internet of things. The article describes the components of this system and the mathematical method of sensor distribution. The latter is the coarse-graining procedure implemented by weighted k-means clustering based on household emission data. Finally, the application of the proposed system is described by the example of air monitoring in Żary — a lowland town in western Poland. The main results demonstrate the model's high effectiveness: the clustering algorithm successfully identified 15 representative measurement zones, and the subsequent deployment confirmed that combining theoretical spatial optimization with IoT infrastructure yields an accurate, highly representative, and economically viable real-time air quality monitoring system.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Eurostat 2021. Applying the degree of urbanisation manual – extensions to level 1 of the classification. Eurostat Statistics Explained. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/.... [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
2.
Johnston, SJ, Basford PJ, Bulot FMJ, Apetroaie-Cristea M, Easton NHC, Davenport C, et al., 2019. City scale particulate matter monitoring using LoRaWAN based air quality IoT devices. Sensors, 19(1), 209.
 
3.
Lu, Y, Giuliano G and Habre R 2021. Estimating hourly PM2.5 concentrations at the neighborhood scale using a low-cost air sensor network: A Los Angeles case study. Environmental Research, 195, 110653.
 
4.
Pant, P, Lal, RM, Guttikunda, SK, Russell, AG, Nagpure AS, Ramaswami A, et al. 2019. Monitoring particulate matter in India: Recent trends and future outlook. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12(1), 45–58.
 
5.
Sarroeira, R, Henriques, J, Sousa, AM, Ferreira da Silva C, Nunes N, Moro S, et al. 2023. Monitoring sensors for urban air quality: The case of the municipality of lisbon. Sensors, 23(18), 7702.
 
6.
Jiao, W, Hagler, G, Williams, R, Sharpe, R, Brown, R, Garver, D, et al. 2016. Community air sensor network (CAIRSENSE) project: Evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern united states. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(11), 5281– 5292.
 
7.
Eurostat 2021. Urban-rural europe – introduction. Eurostat Statistics Explained. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
8.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2013. Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
9.
Nastos, PT and Matzarakis, A 2006. Weather impacts on respiratory infections in Athens, Greece. International Journal of Biometeorology, 50, 358–69.
 
10.
Pope, CA, Dockery, DW and Schwartz, J 1995. Review of epidemiological evidence of health effects of particulate air pollution. Inhalation Toxicology, 7(1),1–18.
 
11.
Spyropoulos, GC, Nastos, PT and Moustris, KP 2021. Performance of aether low-cost sensor device for air pollution measurements in urban environments. Accuracy evaluation applying the air quality index (AQI). Atmosphere, 12(10), 1246.
 
12.
World Health Organization (WHO) 2005. WHO Air Quality Guidelines 2005, vol. 18. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
13.
World Health Organization (WHO) 2019. Ambient (Outdoor) Air Quality and Health. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
14.
Ritchie, H and Roser, M 2022. Outdoor air pollution. Our World in Data.
 
15.
Du, Y, Xu, X, Chu, M, Guo, Y and Wang, J 2015. Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: The epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(1), E8-E19.
 
16.
Ghorani-Azam, A, Riahi-Zanjani, B and Balali-Mood, M 2016. Effects of air pollution on human health and practical measures for prevention in Iran. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 21(1), 65.
 
17.
European Parliament and Council 2008. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
18.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment China 2016. Ambient air quality standards. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
19.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2023. National ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM. [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
20.
Zafra-Pérez A, Medina-García J, Boente C, Gómez-Galán JA, Sánchez de la Campa A, de la Rosa JD 2024. Designing a low-cost wireless sensor network for particulate matter monitoring: Implementation, calibration, and field-test. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 15(9), 102208.
 
21.
World Health Organization (WHO) 2024, National Air Quality Standards. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/air-.... [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
22.
Senthilkumar, R, Venkatakrishnan, P and Balaji, N 2020. Intelligent based novel embedded system based IoT enabled air pollution monitoring system. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 77, 103172.
 
23.
Stojanović, DB, Kleut, D, Davidović, M, Živković, M, Ramadani, U, Jovanović, M, et al 2024. Data evaluation of a low-cost sensor network for atmospheric particulate matter monitoring in 15 municipalities in Serbia. Sensors, 24(13), 4052.
 
24.
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) 2020. Environmental statistics report. Available from: https://www.mospi.gov.in/publi.... [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
25.
Singh, D, Dahiya, M, Kumar, R and Nanda, C 2021. Sensors and systems for air quality assessment monitoring and management: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 289, 112510.
 
26.
Schneider, P, Lahoz WA, van der A R 2015. Recent satellite-based trends of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over large urban agglomerations worldwide. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(3), 1205–20.
 
27.
Baklanov, A, Molina, LT and Gauss, M 2016. Megacities, air quality and climate. Atmospheric Environment, 126, 235–49.
 
28.
List of India stations analyzed, 2024. Available from: https://cpcb.nic.in/monitoring.... [cited 2025 Apr 15].
 
29.
Blythe, P, Neasham, J, Sharif, B, Watson, P, Bell MC, Edwards S, et al 2008. An environmental sensor system for pervasively monitoring road networks. In: IET road transport information and control conference and the ITS united kingdom members’ conference (RTIC 2008), 91.
 
30.
Schneider, P, Castell, N, Vogt, M, Dauge, FR, Lahoz, WA and Bartonova, A 2017. Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information. Environment International, 106, 234–47.
 
31.
Lim, CC, Kim, H, Ruzmyn Vilcassim, MJ, Thurston, GD, Gordon, T, Chen L-C, et al 2019. Mapping urban air quality using mobile sampling with low-cost sensors and machine learning in Seoul, South Korea. Environment International, 131, 105022.
 
32.
De Oliveira RH, de Carneiro CC de, de Almeida FGV, de Oliveira BM, Nunes EHM, dos Santos AS 2019. Multivariate air pollution classification in urban areas using mobile sensors and self-organizing maps. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 5475–88.
 
33.
Weissert, LF, Alberti, K, Miskell, G, Pattinson, W, Salmond, JA, Henshaw, G, et al 2019. Low-cost sensors and microscale land use regression: Data fusion to resolve air quality variations with high spatial and temporal resolution. Atmospheric Environment, 213, 285–95.
 
34.
Stavroulas, I, Grivas, G, Michalopoulos, P, Liakakou, E, Bougiatioti, A, Kalkavouras, P, et al 2020. Field evaluation of low-cost PM sensors (purple air PA-II) under variable urban air quality conditions, in Greece. Atmosphere, 11(9), 926.
 
35.
Sokhi, RS, Moussiopoulos, N, Baklanov, A, Bartzis, J, Coll I, Finardi, S, et al 2022. Advances in air quality research – current and emerging challenges. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(7), 4615–703.
 
36.
Desouza, P, Anjomshoaa, A, Duarte, F, Kahn, R, Kumar, P and Ratti, C 2020. Air quality monitoring case study using mobile low-cost sensors mounted on trash-trucks: Methods development and lessons learned. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102239.
 
37.
Apte, J, Messier, K, Gani, S, Brauer, M, Kirchstetter, T, Lunden M, et al 2017. High-resolution air pollution mapping with google street view cars: Exploiting big data. Environmental Science & Technology, 51.
 
38.
Vajs, I, Drajic, D and Cica, Z 2023. Data-driven machine learning calibration propagation in a hybrid sensor network for air quality monitoring. Sensors, 23, 2815.
 
39.
Jain, AK 2010. Data clustering: 50 years beyond k-means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(8), 651–66.
 
40.
Hartigan JA, Wong MA. Algorithm AS 136 1979. A k-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics, 28, 100–8.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top